Relocating can be challenging, especially when co-parenting is involved. Moving to a new area often requires adjustments not just for parents but for children as well. At Keystone Family Law in Vancouver, Washington, we’re familiar with family dynamics. The process can seem overwhelming, but by prioritizing communication and planning, co-parents can help their children adjust smoothly and thrive after relocation.
Serving those in Clark County; including Vancouver, Camas, Washougal, Battle Ground, Ridgefield, La Center, and more.
Different Forms of Legal Representation: The Pros and Cons
One thing to consider before consulting with an attorney is the level of representation you are looking for. This is often determined by the complexity of the case, the level of involvement you wish to have and the financial resources you have available for legal fees.
There are three main forms of legal representation. Below you will find a short explination of each form as well as some of the pros and cons of each. Ultimately, the form that is right for you will depend on the complexity of the case, the level of involvment you wish to have, as well as the financial resources you have available to put towards legal fees.
Full-Service Representation
The attorney files a notice of appearance and handles all the legal aspects of your case.
Some of the benefits with full-service representation include:
1. Advocacy and representation in court: An attorney can provide representation and advocacy in court, protecting your rights and interests and ensuring that your case is handled fairly.
2. Legal expertise: An attorney has knowledge and experience in the law and can use this expertise to guide you through this process, explaining the legal options available to you and helping you make informed decisions.
3. Negotiation: An attorney can act as a negotiator, helping you reach a settlement agreement without needing a trial.
4. Preparation and filing of legal documents: An attorney can prepare and file legal documents, saving you time and stress and ensuring that all necessary paperwork is completed accurately and on time.
5. Communication: An attorney can communicate with the other party (or the other party's attorney when represented) if you are unable or unwilling to communicate with them directly. This could be the case if there is a protection order in place legally preventing communication between the parties or a general desire to have all communication handled by a third party.
6. Emotional support: Going through a divorce can be an emotional and stressful time. An attorney can provide emotional support, helping you navigate the legal process and addressing any concerns or questions you may have.
Some of the cons with full-service representation include:
1. Cost: Full representation can be more expensive than other forms of representation, as the client is paying for the attorney to handle all aspects of the case. Clients must have the funds available to maintain their trust account at the minimum amount required. Legal fees are often billed on a per hour bases in 6 minute increments. The ultimate cost of representation is outside of the Attorney's control as it based on the individual case, needs of the client, difficulty of the adverse party, as well as the demands made by the Court.
2. Length of the process: Having an attorney handle all aspects of the case can sometimes result in a longer process, as there may be additional negotiations, mediations, discovery requests and court appearances.
3. Loss of control: When you choose full representation, you are entrusting your attorney to handle all aspects of your case. While this can be beneficial in many ways, it can also result in a loss of control for the client, who may be more limited in their ability to make decisions about the direction of their case.
Limited Scope Representation
The attorney files a limited notice of appearance and only handles the clearly defined legal aspects of your case. This is also known as "unbundled" legal services.
Some of the benefits with limited scope representation include:
1. Cost: Limited scope representation is often more affordable than full-representation, as the client is only paying for the specific legal services they need at that moment in time.
2. Flexibility: With limited scope representation, the client has the flexibility to handle some aspects of their case on their own, while still having access to an attorney for more complex or technical tasks.
3. Control: By handling some aspects of their case themselves, the client has more control over the direction of their case, and can make decisions about the specific legal services they want to pay for.
4. Empowerment: Limited scope representation can empower the client to take an active role in their case, which can be a positive experience for those who want to be more involved in the process.
5. Customization: The client can choose the specific legal services they need, allowing them to tailor their representation to their specific needs and preferences.
Some of the cons with limited scope representation include:
1. Limited representation: With limited scope representation, the attorney will only provide representation for the legal issues outlined in the contract.
2. Limited legal expertise: While the client will have access to an attorney for specific tasks, they may not have the same level of knowledge of the case as they would with full-representation, therefore narrowing the legal advice that can be offered.
3. Unforeseen issues: The attorney cannot anticipate all of the legal issues that will arise in the client's case. Access to an attorney to address unforeseen issues may be limited based on availability and contract extension.
4. Risk of mistakes: Without full-service representation, the client may not be aware of all the legal options available to them or may make mistakes in the handling of their case, which could negatively impact the outcome. The attorney's advice is limited to the facts and circumstances at the time they learn them. Any change in facts or circumstances could have an impact on the legal options and/or the handling of their case. Mistakes made by a client could have a significant, unalterable effect on their case.
Ghostwriting Representation
The attorney does not appear in your case and only handles the clearly defined legal aspects of your case. Think of the attorney as a partner who silently advises and drafts legal documents and/or correspondence for the client on a particular aspect of the case.
Some of the benefits with ghostwriting representation include:
1. Cost: Ghostwriting representation is often the most affordable form of representation, as the client is only paying for the specific legal documents they need.
2. Time-saving: By outsourcing the preparation of legal documents to an attorney, the client can save time and focus on other aspects of their case..
3. Expertise: An attorney can provide expertise in the preparation of legal documents, ensuring that the documents are accurate and legally sound.
4. Control: By handling most aspects of their case themselves, the client has more control over the direction of their case, and can make decisions about the specific legal services they want to pay for. The client handles all communication and negotiations with the adverse party themselves.
5. Confidentiality: The client can maintain their privacy and confidentiality, as the attorney will only be working on the preparation of legal documents and will not be involved in any other aspects of the case.
6. Customization: The client can choose the specific legal services they need, allowing them to tailor their representation to their specific needs and preferences.
Some of the cons with ghostwriting representation include:
1. Lack of representation: With ghostwriting representation, the attorney does not represent the client in court, appear in mediations or negotiations or otherwise communicate with the opposing party, opposing counsel, the Court, or other third parties associated with their case. The client must be actively involved in their case.
2. Limited legal expertise: While the client will have access to an attorney for specific tasks, they may not have the same level of legal expertise as they would with the other levels of representation.
3. Unforeseen issues: The attorney cannot anticipate all of the legal issues that will arise in the client's case. Access to an attorney to address unforeseen issues may be limited based on availability and contract extension.
4. Risk of mistakes: Without full-service representation, the client may not be aware of all the legal options available to them or may make mistakes in the handling of their case, which could negatively impact the outcome. The attorney's advice is limited to the facts and circumstances at the time they learn them. Any change in facts or circumstances could have an impact on the legal options and/or the handling of their case. Uninformed actions by a client could have a significant, unalterable effect on the client's case. Additionally, this may result in legal fees which may have been otherwise avoidable with full-representation.
5. Potential for misunderstandings: The client and attorney may have misunderstandings about the scope of their representation, which could result in disagreements or disputes. This could result in the termination of representation.
In conclusion, the level of representation you decide on is a very personal decision as there are pros and cons to each. If you can afford it, full-representation is going to give you the best chance of a positive outcome on your case as well as legal guidance throught the legal process rather than in small portions throughout.
RECENT POSTS
Child support is a critical component of family law that guarantees children receive financial support from both parents, regardless of their relationship status. In Washington, child support is governed by a combination of state statutes and guidelines that aim to balance the financial responsibilities between parents.